Modern democratic societies are characterized by diverse identities, interests, values, and political perspectives that are frequently marginalized or undermined by institutional representation. Differences relating to ethnicity, religion, class, gender, geography, livelihood, generation, and political orientation generate competing understandings of social priorities and public interests.
The Citizens’ Forums (පුරවැසි සංසද / பிரஜைகள் மன்றம்) are established as inclusive public spaces where these differences and conflicts can be articulated, discussed, and constructively contested. Rather than seeking to eliminate disagreement or impose artificial consensus, the Forums create sustained opportunities for citizens to engage with competing perspectives while recognizing the democratic legitimacy of adversaries.
Grounded in Chantal Mouffe’s theory of agonistic pluralism, the initiative recognizes that conflict and disagreement are inherent features of democratic politics. The democratic challenge is therefore not to suppress conflict, but to transform potentially antagonistic relationships (viewing opponents as enemies to destroy) into agonistic relationships between legitimate adversaries bounded by democratic recognition.
The Citizens’ Forums operate according to five non-negotiable democratic pillars designed to foster sustained citizen participation, pluralism, and constructive community contestation.
Different identities, interests, experiences, and political perspectives are formally recognized as legitimate and indispensable components of democratic society.
Participants are encouraged to challenge ideas, policies, and positions constructively, while recognizing the constitutional right of others to express competing views.
Particular attention is devoted to groups whose voices are conventionally absent, weak, or silenced in mainstream socio-political decision-making processes.
Disagreement is treated as an essential, healthy component of democratic life rather than automatically as a problem requiring forced consensus or suppression.
Connecting discussion and contestation with practical citizen action, community initiatives, and structured, organized engagement with public institutions.
Overall Objective: To strengthen an inclusive, participatory, and pluralistic democratic culture by creating sustained spaces where citizens can articulate diverse interests, engage in constructive political and social contestation, and participate meaningfully in decisions affecting their communities.
The programmatic framework encompasses eight structured community-level action lines designed to activate citizens, empower workers, advance interspecies justice, and hold public authorities accountable.
Establish permanent Citizens’ Forums at community, divisional, and district levels across Sri Lanka. Each forum operates with an inclusive membership structure, transparent assembly protocols, and clear democratic voting procedures to ensure community ownership.
Conduct grassroots consultations across villages and estates to identify:
Organize structured civic forums around contested public issues following the agonistic dialogue model:
Issue ➔ Different Perspectives ➔ Evidence & Experiences ➔ Contestation ➔ Possible Areas of Collective Action
Participants are trained to question arguments without personal attacks or denying adversary legitimacy, articulating agonizing subjects into a shared collective will for civic change.
Hold periodic, high-impact public hearings where ordinary citizens directly interface with:
Articulate the passionate engagement of youth to take a proactive leadership role in democratic renewal:
Develop institutional mechanisms ensuring women’s perspectives are not merely included numerically, but genuinely govern decisions:
Establish estate and plantation workers in an autonomous public platform to advance their struggle for recognition, wage justice, equality, and dignity:
Humans’ moral engagement to foster conviviality between Humans, Non-Humans, and The Nature, developing a Human Front representing Sentient Beings:
Rooted in Laclau and Mouffe's Chain of Equivalence, the Forums link diverse societal demands—from estate laborers to wildlife protectors—under a shared democratic framework for equality, participation, and accountability.
The core grassroots base whose direct voices and lived experiences form the bedrock of the assemblies:
Key duty bearers and civic actors engaged through public accountability interfaces:
Measurable civic shifts resulting from the establishment of permanent agonistic forums across the districts.
More citizens, particularly historically excluded groups, actively engage in discussions concerning public affairs and local priorities.
Communities develop deep awareness that societies contain genuine, legitimate differences of identity, culture, and political perspective.
Participants acquire the ability to contest opposing views without treating competitors as enemies—the core Mouffean agonistic foundation.
Establishing binding pathways through which communities communicate grievances, scrutinize budgets, and compel state responsiveness.
Elevating marginalized human communities alongside non-human sentient life and regional natural ecosystems in municipal decision-making.
Local authorities and departmental decision-makers encounter regular, structured, community-led scrutiny and social audits.
Grassroots citizens acquire practical mastery in public negotiation, advocacy, democratic facilitation, and the defense of the Public Good.
Anuradhapura
Kurunegala
Anuradhapura
Kurunegala
Monaragala
Badulla
Monaragala
Badulla
Nuwara Eliya
Colombo
Nuwara Eliya
Colombo
Puttalam
Vavuniya
Puttalam
Vavuniya
Articles published under the Citizens Forums category will automatically appear here with clickable links.
Director & Civic Advisor
director@csrsrilanka.lk
Head of Grassroots Assemblies
forums@csrsrilanka.lk
RTI & Public Interest Advocacy
rti@csrsrilanka.lk